I watched the movie "The Social Network" which is an American drama film directed by David Pincher. The main character is Harvard student Mark Zuckerberg, played by Jesse Eisenberg. Mark's best friend, Eduardo Saverin, played by Andrew Grafield, is the next biggest character. The movie starts off with Mark having dinner with his girlfriend. This is where we are introduced to Mark's ego and bad attitude. They get into a fight and she breaks up with him and calls him an asshole. Calling him an asshole is a key part because that is what set Zuckerberg off to start creating his project. He goes home too his dorm and is very drunk. He starts blogging about his ex-girlfirend and how she is an awful human being and so on. He then sparks the idea to create a rating website. Its where two pictures of girls on campus go side by side and you can pick who is hotter. Obviously, it was a big hit with the boy students, but it really pissed off the girl students. Then the Winklevoss twins heard about Zuckerberg's rating website and how big of a hit it was, they wanted him to help them create their own website. The idea for the website was a dating website. That sparked Zuckerberg to create Facebook. His buddy Saverin helped with the financial situation while Zuckerberg did all the coding and appearance of the website. A key point that is in the movie is Mark never says thank you to Saverin. Saverin funded the whole website and once it was created Mark met a new partner. That new partner was Sean Parker, creator of Napster. Sean didn't like Saverin off the bat and devised a plan to screw him over in the contract of Facebook. In the end Saverin gets screwed and sues Zuckerberg for everything he has. The ending scene is the hearing and lets everyone know what the resolution of the case was.
A key component in the movie that really stands out to me is how Zuckerberg doesn't say thank you ever. Throughout the movie Saverin is expecting a thank you or any kind of acknowledgement that he is paying for everything. There are scenes where Saverin pays a big amount and sits there waiting for a thank you and Zuckerberg just goes back to work and doesn't acknowledge him. Zuckerberg is an asshole throughout the whole film. that brings us back to the first scene of the movie where him and his girlfriend break up and she tells him "...your going to go through life thinking girls don't like you because your nerdy when in reality its because your an asshole." He doesn't believe it, but everyone who has seen the movie would say he is one. By him being one thats what caused the major lawsuit between him and Saverin.
In the end I really liked this movie. I can safely say this is one of my favorite movie. I really love the camera work. The lighting in the movie is usually darker and that is to show that this is a darker movie. There are sad and intense parts throughout the whole movie. When Zuckerberg is on screen and talking he is usually in the darkest spot to show that he has some evil in him. The plot is really easy to follow and it is fun to watch. The plot is very suspenseful and I recommend this movie to people who like darker and more suspenseful movies. I give this move an 8.5/10.
Thursday, March 27, 2014
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
MYST 3
This is a movie I have wanted to see for a very
long time now. I finally got around to it the other night. I really enjoyed
watching this movie mostly because basically the whole time they are doing
something involving basketball. Basketball is what intrigued me to give this
movie a go in the first place. This movie was directed by Ron Shelton. Ron
Shelton also directed "Bill Durham" 1988.
“White Men Can’t Jump” is a great
mix of sports, comedy, and drama. With the main character being Billy Hoyle,
played by Woody Harrelson, and Sidney Deane, played by Wesley Snipes. That
makes for an all-star duo for the film. Billy Hoyle moves into a Los Angeles
apartment with his girlfriend Gloria Clemente, played by Rosie Perez, and he
goes onto street ball courts to hustle other players. One day Sidney Deane and
his team were playing when a player on the other team got hurt. Deane urged the
other team to pick the white bystander who assumed to not be able to play, that
bystander being Billy. The team picks Billy and to everyone’s amazement Billy
leads his team to beat Deane’s team. Billy’s strategy is to act like he can’t
play at first, and then turn on the gas and not miss a shot for the rest of the
game. Deane realized he just got played, and he wants in on Billy’s game. They
then partner up to hustle the courts of Los Angeles. While Billy would hustle,
his girlfriend would research obscure facts due to the fact she longs for the
chance to be on the game show “Jeopardy.” Everything starts to go down hill
near the end of the movie. Billy and Gloria fight all the time and they split
up, and get back together a lot. When Gloria gets on “Jeopardy” she wins. She
gives Billy money to get new and better clothes to clean himself up, but he
uses that money to bet. Billy was warned if he uses the money to gamble that
him and her were done for good. Billy still uses the money to gamble with deane
and Billy winds up doubling his money. Sadly, Gloria kept to her word and left
him for good. Billy is crushed, but at least he has Sidney Deane with the new
found friendship throughout the movie. I really enjoyed the film and give it a
8/10.
One thing I did not like was how
predictable the movie was. Although there was a valiant effort to try to keep
the audience on the edge of there seat with each pick up game, everybody knew
what the outcome of the games were going to be. Not even just the games were
predictable, the character Gloria, played by Rosie Perez, was a very hot headed
character. If you saw Billy Hoyle make a wrong move you knew that Gloria was
going to explode on him when he returned to the apartment. Other than that
I thoroughly enjoyed the movie.
In all, I really enjoyed the
movie and the camera work. For example, in the scene where they are coming home
from the 2-on-2 pick up tournament and Billy bets Sidney he can dunk. They show
it from an angle coming from the street. It looks as if your a person standing
on the other side of the street watching this bet happen. That was
my favorite shot of the whole movie because you saw these two black
figures standing next to a hoop and one of them trying to dunk and failing but
the other one is laughing at him. Again as i stated above this movie was
great and i recommend it to everyone.
MYST 2
I watched the movie "Dazed and Confused" over the weekend. I have been eyeing that movie for a good year before I actually sat down and watched it. I know with the iffy title it doesn't sound like it is going to have that thick of a plot or any plot twists. Well, you're right. Basically what this movie consists of is a group of 5 high school football players in Texas in the 70's. It is the last day of school and all they want to do is figure out where the party is at. Back in the 70's there were traditions at some schools. At this school, one of their traditions is that seniors paddle the incoming freshman attending the school next year. The main character, Randy "Pink" Floyd, played by Jason London is the usual main character in a high school film. He is the star quarterback who walks around with poise and swagger. He has a girlfriend, but that doesn't stop him from talking to other girls. Pink finds a group of eighth grade kids named Mitch, Karl, Tommy, and Hirschfelder. Mitch is one of Pink's friends younger brother, so they go out of their way to find him and paddle him. After they paddle Mitch, Pink gives him a ride home. When they arrive at Mitch's house Pink asks Mitch to go out with them tonight. When they go out that night everyone already loves Mitch because he came with Pink. As I stated above there really isn't a big plot to this movie. To sum up the rest of the movie, basically the whole senior grade and Mitch go to a field and throw a huge party. Then Pink and his boys and Wooderson, the older guy still living in his high school days, played by Mathew McConaughey; go to the high school to engage in an illegal activity on the 50 yard line. The cops come and they call the coach instead of Pink's parents when the police see that it is Randy Floyd they arrested. Everyone gets let go and Wooderson and Pink drive to Houston to buy Aerosmith tickets and the movie ends.
One important part of the movie that the director never lets you forget is that Pink is a rebel. In the beginning of the movie Pink receives a slip from his coach saying that the team will not participate in any illegal activities or in no way shape or form jeopardize their season. The whole team has to sign in and give it to the coach. Pink doesn't like that, and decides he is going to wait the longest he can before signing it, IF he signs it. There is a scene right after Pink and his crew talk to their coach and he crumbles up the piece of paper and throws it the direction of the coaches. That shows him being a rebel and not wanting to listen to what is perceived as "the man." Throughout the whole movie teammates are trying to get him to just sign the paper so he could play. There is a scene where his friend Benny and himself are sitting in a truck talking about it and Pink tells Benny that maybe he doesn't want to play football this year. Benny gets very upset and freaks out on him. That is a key moment because Pink decides then that he won't be playing due to the expectations he didn't want to live up too.
Overall the movie was a good time filler. Although it had no plot it still got you engaged. The best part of the movie was the soundtrack. I feel like that had such a big part to the success in this movie. It was all classic rock and well known songs of the 70's. I feel movie soundtracks are a very key component in making a movie good. I liked this movie, but what made me like it even more was the soundtrack. I recommend this movie to anyone who likes high school movies. 7/10 stars.
Monday, March 17, 2014
Review of the Reviews
Positive Review:
This review is a bit of a longer review, but has great things to say about the movie "Moneyball." The tone of this review seems very upbeat. What I would take away from this is that he had a great time watching this film and also learned a lot about the system the Oakland Athletics baseball organization tried to use in 2001. He starts off the review stating facts of the game where the Athletics played the Yankees for the division title. The A's sadly lost that game 5-3 as the review states in the second paragraph. Manohla Dargis, the writer of the review, focuses mostly on the plot and character of the film. He talks about the plot and how he loves the storyline. He also talks about how great the cast is. He feels that every person actor/actress was casted perfectly for their roles. He relates this film to "The Social Network" because of the number systems they use. "Moneyball" uses math equations to scout their players based on hits and on base percentage, while "The Social Network" uses math equations to create a website. He also touches on the fact of how similar the cinemetography is between the two films.
Negative Review:
This review is a very bitter toned review. He starts off the review saying "'Moneyball' is a mess of a film..." The reason he is so bitter towards this film is because of the way it would show flashbacks at random times. Although I felt that those scenes were necessary to the film, the writer of this review feels they were worthless. The review is set up in about 6 paragraphs with nothing good about the movie. He uses phrases like "aimless plot" and "one-dimensional" all to describe either the characters or the film itself. He uses the word "one-dimensional" to describe basically every character and complains the whole rest of the review about how the film lacks "multi-dimensional" characters. As you can tell, he focuses on the cast mostly. Completely bashing the script and how the cast acted. I can see how he thinks that, but he kind of over-exaggerated the boringness of the characters I feel.
2. The scene where Brad Pitt is driving away from the stadium because he feels being there is bad luck, and he turns around to go to the stadium and the A's loose is a very significant part of the movie and I feel that it is a very good scene. It is a very good scene due to that being the falling action of the film. Once he went to the stadium everything falls down hill.
3. The positive review would be more convincing because of the vocabulary and tone of the review. Dargis really explains the plot and why it is good and also how it can seen as a bad movie. So he gives you both side of the movie in one review. I feel that knowing both sides of what can potentially be an argument is very helpful and wise.
4. I would want to include how much I like the cast. Despite what the negative review says, I feel that the cast was great. Jonah Hill played the stats guy perfect while Brad Pitt played his boss and friend very well. I would leave out some of the plot line because there are some scenes that don't contribute to the film at all, but apparently are very important to the plot and I just don't see it. In all, I really liked the film and had a great time watching it.
This review is a bit of a longer review, but has great things to say about the movie "Moneyball." The tone of this review seems very upbeat. What I would take away from this is that he had a great time watching this film and also learned a lot about the system the Oakland Athletics baseball organization tried to use in 2001. He starts off the review stating facts of the game where the Athletics played the Yankees for the division title. The A's sadly lost that game 5-3 as the review states in the second paragraph. Manohla Dargis, the writer of the review, focuses mostly on the plot and character of the film. He talks about the plot and how he loves the storyline. He also talks about how great the cast is. He feels that every person actor/actress was casted perfectly for their roles. He relates this film to "The Social Network" because of the number systems they use. "Moneyball" uses math equations to scout their players based on hits and on base percentage, while "The Social Network" uses math equations to create a website. He also touches on the fact of how similar the cinemetography is between the two films.
Negative Review:
This review is a very bitter toned review. He starts off the review saying "'Moneyball' is a mess of a film..." The reason he is so bitter towards this film is because of the way it would show flashbacks at random times. Although I felt that those scenes were necessary to the film, the writer of this review feels they were worthless. The review is set up in about 6 paragraphs with nothing good about the movie. He uses phrases like "aimless plot" and "one-dimensional" all to describe either the characters or the film itself. He uses the word "one-dimensional" to describe basically every character and complains the whole rest of the review about how the film lacks "multi-dimensional" characters. As you can tell, he focuses on the cast mostly. Completely bashing the script and how the cast acted. I can see how he thinks that, but he kind of over-exaggerated the boringness of the characters I feel.
2. The scene where Brad Pitt is driving away from the stadium because he feels being there is bad luck, and he turns around to go to the stadium and the A's loose is a very significant part of the movie and I feel that it is a very good scene. It is a very good scene due to that being the falling action of the film. Once he went to the stadium everything falls down hill.
3. The positive review would be more convincing because of the vocabulary and tone of the review. Dargis really explains the plot and why it is good and also how it can seen as a bad movie. So he gives you both side of the movie in one review. I feel that knowing both sides of what can potentially be an argument is very helpful and wise.
4. I would want to include how much I like the cast. Despite what the negative review says, I feel that the cast was great. Jonah Hill played the stats guy perfect while Brad Pitt played his boss and friend very well. I would leave out some of the plot line because there are some scenes that don't contribute to the film at all, but apparently are very important to the plot and I just don't see it. In all, I really liked the film and had a great time watching it.
Friday, March 14, 2014
1935 Movie Project
Our movie, Medal of Honor, is supposed to keep the audience on their toes, but also cheer up the states because of the great depression they were currently in. Our cast consists of: Fred Astaire and Clark Gable. Our story consists of the little boy in town named Johnny Devirito gets drafted for WWI. When he comes to inspection they don't take him due to his little size. Johnny doesn't like the fact he got denied, so Johnny enters the war anyway. Our story meaning is do not underestimate anyone. Although Johnny is little he could be the hero of his platoon.
We chose the war film genre because WWI was semi-recent and we put an uplifting twist to it by having a hero and a happy ending. As I stated above the point of picking this was to create an uplifting movie to America because of how depressed they are due to the great depression.
We chose MGM and the director Lewis Milestone. We chose Lewis Milestone because he directed "All Quiet on the Western Front" which is also a war film. Milestone works under MGM so that worked out perfectly for us. We chose our cast because of how popular they are and the way they look fits each roll perfectly
The Hays Code effects us a little bit because we have a war film so we can't really show any blood or gruesome scenes. We won't be using a lot of technology because we don't really need to use technology for our film.
We chose the war film genre because WWI was semi-recent and we put an uplifting twist to it by having a hero and a happy ending. As I stated above the point of picking this was to create an uplifting movie to America because of how depressed they are due to the great depression.
We chose MGM and the director Lewis Milestone. We chose Lewis Milestone because he directed "All Quiet on the Western Front" which is also a war film. Milestone works under MGM so that worked out perfectly for us. We chose our cast because of how popular they are and the way they look fits each roll perfectly
The Hays Code effects us a little bit because we have a war film so we can't really show any blood or gruesome scenes. We won't be using a lot of technology because we don't really need to use technology for our film.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)